Considering that there will not look like any "Formal" Load Data on the market for this Load, can a number of you offer a place to begin with this mix and matters to think about when Doing the job this Load up?
I've utilised H4831 (and H4831SC), and I utilize it. There aren't lots of cartridges which i utilize it for as I appear to be often to gravitate to other powders. Nonetheless, I am unable to express that it isn't going to operate. It is just that A few other powders work much better for just a provided cartridge. By way of example, in the 280, H4831 gave me superior velocity and really good teams with Nosler a hundred and forty AB. Even so, RL19 was marginally much better in precision, although the velocity was just about equivalent.
What's the main difference? Compression. With no Excessive/large compression related to the extended grain 7828, the stress curve was altered as well as load fell aside.
I have experienced some rifles that fouled really lousy. Finding the many copper out was an actual PIA till I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
INgunner54 said: It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Uncovered a node and shot some teams.
It is very likely that no more dialogue is needed, by which situation we advocate setting up a different thread. If nevertheless you're feeling your response is required it is possible to however do this.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very constrained provide of Varget, and also a large amount a lot more accessible H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads Virtually exclusively, mainly because which is what the rifles shoot the most effective.
Im beneath the comprehending I choose to use h4831sc. I've read that these powders are equivalent Moreover the shorter grain size of the sc. Really should I even now be looking out for h4381sc?
dioni.a.312 explained: In my experience the only real serious change would be that the shortcut meters greater by way of reloading products. The moment It is really loaded theres no functional distinction. I have h4831sc load data listened to the shortcut might have a tiny little bit faster melt away level but It appears insignificant. Click to extend...
[email protected] gn and a hundred and fifteen CT's, I have killed more Deer with this particular combo than all of the rifles I have put together, Get the job done approximately this nevertheless the sweet spot are going to be all around 54, I am a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat works rather well for me When your interested
I have had very similar encounter with H4350. For me, some ball powders would not shoot nicely with just about anything besides Fed215's. Some elements just Will h4831sc load data not Participate in effectively with other. Appears like you've got selected h4831sc 3 fantastic powders, I'd personally anticipate at the least one of them to shoot.
Sure, you can use the exact same load data for H4831 vs H4831SC, even so the SC version may well let you get a bit additional in scenarios in which you are maxing out case quantity Using the typical powder just before achieving pressure boundaries.
You could both: one) Go on and have the objects stated underneath quickly faraway from your buying cart:
I sawed a person in half to view how thick the jackets ended up, they usually were easily twice as thick as being a 50-grain hollow position was. Ditto for that sixty four-grain Power Stage, as these bullets are crafted for deer, not prairie dogs or woodchucks. You now know every little thing I find out about the 22-250 and sluggish-burning powders, and I do not know nearly anything in the slightest degree about the 223. I doubt that you are going to get anywhere with that cartridge and 4831, but let us know the way it goes.